Richard Kostelanetz
RichardKostelanetz.com
- Preface
- Advice
- Ambitions
- Anarchism
- Anthologies
- Aphorisms
- Appreciations
- Architecture
- Autobiography
- Art Politics
- Arts History
- Avant-Garde
- Book Art
- Business
- Colleagues
- Criticism Criticism
- Cultural Criticism
- Cultural History
- Demolitions
- Distinctions
- Economics
- Editing
- Education
- Elites & Pseudo-Elites
- Elsewhere
- Esthetics
- Experience, Personal
- Experience, Professional
- Fiction
- Film
- Historiography
- Illustrative Anecdotes
- Individuals Admired
- Individuals Disparaged
- Institutional Criticism
- Interpersonal Intelligence
- Judaism
- Language
- Literary Criticism
- Literary Granting
- Literary Politics
- Literary Sociology
- Manifestoes
- Music
- New York City
- Personal Independence
- Poetry
- Policies
- Political Criticism
- Precursors
- Prefaces
- Publishing
- Purposes
- Radical Politics
- Radio
- Scholarship
- Smarts
- Social History
- Sociology
- Sociology of the Arts
- Soho
- Sports
- Standards
- Theater Criticism
- Travel
- Video
- Visual Arts Criticism
Radio
—“Orson Welles’s Radio Books ” (1989)Though [Orson] Welles was a theater man, he thought that radio should draw its material not from plays but from prose narrative, which he could introduce in the guise of an uncle in your home living room, beginning a story that would then be dramatized. Whereas American radio drama before Welles consisted largely of dialogue, often performed before a live audience (all to preserve the convention of theater), Welles customarily performed in an otherwise silent studio. This bias accounts for why all his major radio programs were based upon fictions—not only an H. G. Wells novel for his War of the Worlds but a Booth Tarkington novel for The Magnificent Ambersons.