Richard Kostelanetz
- Preface
- Advice
- Ambitions
- Anarchism
- Anthologies
- Aphorisms
- Appreciations
- Architecture
- Autobiography
- Art Politics
- Arts History
- Avant-Garde
- Book Art
- Business
- Colleagues
- Criticism Criticism
- Cultural Criticism
- Cultural History
- Demolitions
- Distinctions
- Economics
- Editing
- Education
- Elites & Pseudo-Elites
- Elsewhere
- Esthetics
- Experience, Personal
- Experience, Professional
- Fiction
- Film
- Historiography
- Illustrative Anecdotes
- Individuals Admired
- Individuals Disparaged
- Institutional Criticism
- Interpersonal Intelligence
- Judaism
- Language
- Literary Criticism
- Literary Granting
- Literary Politics
- Literary Sociology
- Manifestoes
- Music
- New York City
- Personal Independence
- Poetry
- Policies
- Political Criticism
- Precursors
- Prefaces
- Publishing
- Purposes
- Radical Politics
- Radio
- Scholarship
- Smarts
- Social History
- Sociology
- Sociology of the Arts
- Soho
- Sports
- Standards
- Theater Criticism
- Travel
- Video
- Visual Arts Criticism
Travel
In downtown Stockholm is a small park, the Kungsträdgården, perhaps fifty yards by two hundred, with a familiar assortment of benches, pathways, and plots of grass. By itself this bucolic urban oasis looks scarcely different from other small downtown parks around the world; but what is different is that, in several years of visits, I have rarely heard any of its patrons turn his of her radio loud, or play an instrument and make any other noises that might disturb the acoustic tranquility of one’s neighbors. A centerpiece of this King’s garden is a floor chessboard with waist-high pieces; and even as moves are made, the onlookers are all silent. To me this park epitomizes Stockholm’s enviable quest for urban quietude.
—“Buenos Aires” (June, 1987)My next step was Montevideo, a city on the other side of the Plata river; and it seemed a different world, with fewer people and far fewer cars, cleaner air, a more civilized tone. To a New Yorker who had fallen in love in Buenos Aires, Montevideo reminded me of Boston.
It is common to speak of Las Vegas as a one-industry town, but that industry is not just legalized gambling, which is part of the whole. Nor is the principal industry tourism, though the airport remarkably close to the city reportedly ranks tenth in the world in gross passenger traffic. No, the business of Las Vegas is simply, shamelessly, and amicably separating outsiders from their money.
Precisely by making gambling legal (or refusing to make it illegal), the state of Nevada created economic opportunity, incidentally epitomizing the American genius for mass-merchandizing something that Europeans thought strictly for the very rich—the pleasure of casino gambling (and losing money). Given these egalitarian openness, Las Vegas became a thousand times larger than Monte Carlo, servicing millions of avid bettors annually.